Rolex Explorer M124270 Clean Factory Review

The Rolex Explorer M124270 model is produced by Clean Factory with a solid 904L stainless steel case, 36 mm diameter and a high-precision automatic Super Clone movement architecture. It is among the most successful 1:1 super clone watch reviews on the market, with its sapphire crystal AR coating glass, original case tolerances and detailed workmanship.

That's why in this section, we have prepared a section on the occasion of the release of Clean Explorer, which deals with whether it achieves a certain level of realism, especially when compared to the original. Is it worth buying as a consumer? This is a subject that many watch enthusiasts are curious about.

The watch we see looks quite plain; A classic watch. There are no very complex functions in the dial design, it is just for normal time display purposes. We can also see a small crown below the 6 o'clock bar. In the official launch of Rolex, this crown logo had already stated that the Explorer carries the 3230 movement from the latest 32 series.

Movement and Caliber Performance

Likewise, Clean Explorer I also carries the 3230 movement; There is only a two-stage winding adjustment and the movement is quite stable.

We understand from the movement that Clean Rolex has updated this Explorer to match the original. The entire black dial now shows no color difference compared to the original. When buying a replica watch, we generally recommend that the first choice is a black dial with no color difference; At least the color difference is a big plus and we don't have to worry about knowing it's fake at a glance. Some English inscriptions and the crown logo engraved on the inner dial ring (rehaut) do not cause much trouble in comparison at the moment; Their positions are exactly at 6 o'clock, the font of the letter R, which we care about, is exactly the same, and the general curvature is also very good.

Strap, Buckle and Comfort

The inverted triangle part and the font of the 3-6-9 stick hour markers are metal framed; The corners are also rounded, so the texture and sense of depth is the same as the original stick marks.

Dial and Hand Details

The lume filling placed inside gives a matte, sandblasted texture during the day; a state similar to ice frost. It doesn't have the slightest flaw now compared to the original.

The general shape and structure of the hour and minute hands are normally trouble-free. If Clean Explorer didn't make these parts well or didn't want to spend time replicating them, it might well have used off-the-shelf hour and minute hands; However, this would be relatively costly, so Clean developed the hour and minute hands independently.

As with the stick hour markers, lume filling is placed inside; Imported from Switzerland, the same material as Rolex is used and the resulting lume effect is exactly the same. As can be seen in the comparison photo on the oil-based printed dial surface, the printed surface of Clean Explorer I is slightly milkier in color, meaning it is newer. The surface of the original has entered a slight oxidation process; Thus, there is a difference between the new clock and the old clock.

However, the overall printed surface and dimensions are fine. Especially the extension and curvature of the letters of the ROLEX logo are seamless. Then comes the glass lens; Currently, all high-quality Rolex replicas use blue-toned, high-permeability sapphire glass, so it is not an overly expensive material. Of course, if we compare it to the period when flat glass was used a few years ago, it would be much better; It's completely different now, it's standard in all of them.

General Evaluation and Conclusion

That's it in a nutshell for the dial details; It is a model with relatively few flaws among classic watches. Therefore, when we compare the dial part, there is not much to compare or a big difference. On the contrary, although it looks simple, it is not easy to replicate it. If it is done well, it will be superior; if it is done poorly, it will result in inadequacy.

But don't worry; Clean Rolex always uses truly high-level workmanship when making replicas. The entire watch is made of 904L steel material; The shape of the case and its curve visible from the side are made quite perfectly. If there was even the slightest mistake, it would directly affect the thickness of the watch and make it incompatible with the original. At this point Clean is extremely

It solidly achieves exactly the same result.

Case and Body Workmanship

The bezel part looks almost exactly like the Oyster bezel; The overall curve and light reflection angle from the top to the edge are exactly the same as the original Oyster bezel. Also, it does not give a bad texture feeling when touched by hand.

The bracelet part is of normal standard, there is not much fineness on it. Likewise, if Clean Explorer does not want to develop this bracelet production line, it can well use the AR Factory bracelet, no problem.

As for the buckle, the corners of the crown logo are rounded; It is not a push-on design like the Oyster Perpetual's buckle. This three-dimensional, raised logo is identical to the Submariner buckle. The engraved inscriptions on the inside are clear; Compared to the original, I think this buckle is even better made than the original factory buckle.

After this, there are not many review comparisons left for the watch in general. Personally, under today's market conditions, you may not choose Clean Explorer and choose other manufacturers; Their prices are also cheaper than the Clean factory, but they are definitely not as good as Clean in terms of quality. This is inevitable; The logic of 'what you pay, what you get' definitely applies. So there is no need to compare other inferior versions. Choosing Clean Explorer is the best choice. Anyway, in this section, the comparison of Clean Explorer I with the original is completely close to the original, at about 97 percent.
I hope this article helps you. We will share more detailed disassembly, real shot review and real-replica comparison in the future.